Conversation
The repo is receiving pull requests from accounts that open hundreds to thousands of them across unrelated projects in a day. The diffs are coherent and target real open issues, so they cannot be dismissed on sight — each one costs a full review. Say plainly what the bar is. AI assistance is fine and disclosed; code the author has not read or run is not; unsolicited volume submissions are closed without review. Add a pull request template that asks for verification and disclosure up front. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes add a pull request template and update contribution guidance. The documentation now covers verification, Swift tests, AI assistance disclosure, diff review, issue assignment, contribution quality, and automated submission rejection. ChangesContribution Guidance
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@CONTRIBUTING.md`:
- Around line 41-43: Update the open-issue guidance in CONTRIBUTING.md to remove
the claim that commenting guarantees the work will be read. Replace it with
wording that explains commenting allows planned work to be tracked, while
preserving the instruction to comment before taking an issue.
🪄 Autofix
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: a9263668-ef66-485e-9736-e4b2296ee213
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.mdCONTRIBUTING.md
Comment on lines
+41
to
+43
| If you want to take an open issue, comment on it first and I will assign it to | ||
| you. That costs you one line and guarantees your work gets read. | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
Remove the guarantee of review.
guarantees your work gets read is not under the repository’s control. It also conflicts with Lines 101-104, which state that some pull requests are closed without review. Replace the guarantee with a statement about tracking planned work.
Proposed wording
-That costs you one line and guarantees your work gets read.
+That helps maintainers track planned work before you start.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
Suggested change
| If you want to take an open issue, comment on it first and I will assign it to | |
| you. That costs you one line and guarantees your work gets read. | |
| If you want to take an open issue, comment on it first and I will assign it to | |
| you. That costs you one line and helps maintainers track planned work before you start. |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@CONTRIBUTING.md` around lines 41 - 43, Update the open-issue guidance in
CONTRIBUTING.md to remove the claim that commenting guarantees the work will be
read. Replace it with wording that explains commenting allows planned work to be
tracked, while preserving the instruction to comment before taking an issue.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this changes
Adds an AI-assisted contributions section to
CONTRIBUTING.mdand a pull request template that asks for verification and AI disclosure up front.Why
Three of the five open PRs from non-maintainers are from accounts running automated contribution farms:
mvanhornfloze-the-geniussunnnn2005They are not the classic spam shape. The diffs are coherent, tested, lint-clean, and target real open issues — #387 and #389 are mine, #364 is a genuine user's. That is what makes them expensive: none can be dismissed without a full read.
The policy is deliberately not an AI ban. Most recent work here is agent-assisted, so a ban would be both hypocritical and wrong. It draws the line at accountability and consent instead: disclose the tool, run the suite, be able to explain the diff, and don't open patches nobody asked for.
Paired with a repo setting change (not in this diff): fork PR workflows now require approval for all external contributors rather than only first-time ones, so unreviewed PRs no longer consume Actions minutes on the >10min fixture pipeline.
How you verified it
Docs only — no code paths touched. Rendered headings and the new
#ai-assisted-contributionsanchor match the Topics list.🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary by CodeRabbit