Comparing two specs

usage diff compares two versions of a CLI spec and classifies changes as breaking, compatible, or metadata-only. Pass the released spec first and the new spec second:

usage diff released.usage.kdl current.usage.kdl

breaking [flag-spelling-removed] at ex: flag '--jobs' no longer answers to '-j'
breaking [choice-removed] at ex: flag '--color' no longer accepts 'never'
breaking [cmd-removed] at ex: command 'old-thing' was removed
compatible [flag-added] at ex: flag '--quiet' was added
compatible [cmd-added] at ex: command 'new-thing' was added
metadata [help-changed] at ex: flag '--force' help text changed

Found 3 breaking, 2 compatible, 1 metadata change(s)

The command exits 1 when it finds a breaking change, making it suitable for a release check. It compares the interfaces described by the files; it does not run the applications or detect changes in their implementation.

The three categories

One rule draws the lines.

breaking — a command line that worked against the old spec now fails, binds differently, or resolves to a different value. A removed flag, a lost short spelling, a narrowed choices set, a positional that became required, a new conflicts, a default that moved.

compatible — the interface gained something, or relaxed a rule. Every command line that worked still works and still means the same thing. A new optional flag, a widened choices set, a requirement dropped, a new subcommand.

metadata — nothing about parsing moved: help text, help_heading, display_order, hidden-ness, effect, deprecation notices, a renamed positional, an internal flag rename that kept every spelling.

The interesting cases are the ones where the same edit lands in different categories depending on context:

edit	category	why
dropping a value from a strict choices	breaking	the value is now rejected
dropping a value from choices strict=#false	metadata	the value is still accepted, just no longer offered
listing a value in a strict=#false set	metadata	it was already accepted; the list decides what is offered
appending an optional positional	compatible	no word that used to bind moves
appending a required positional	breaking	an invocation without it now fails
adding a default	compatible	nothing was resolved there before
changing or removing a default	breaking	it moves ground the caller was already standing on
gaining a conflicts	breaking	a combination that was valid is now rejected
gaining an overrides	compatible	a collision that was an error now resolves
gaining a group member, multiple=#true	metadata	membership only decides what satisfies required
gaining a group member, exclusive group	breaking	the new member conflicts with the rest
renaming a command that keeps an alias	metadata	the old word still selects it
renaming a command with no alias	breaking	the old word selects nothing
adding a command nothing else answered to	compatible	the word meant nothing before
adding a command over external_subcommand	breaking	the word used to reach an external command
adding a command where a positional bound	breaking	the word used to be that argument's value
declaring required_unless on a flag	breaking	the flag is now required unless one of them is present
adding to a non-empty required_unless	compatible	one more way to be excused from the requirement
dropping subcommand_precedence_over_arg	breaking	a word that selected a command now fills an argument
a renamed_to config key that is not there	breaking	the promise about where the value went is not kept

A rename is not the only thing that can happen to a command in one release, so a renamed command is compared against what it became. Those findings are located under the old name — what a reader wants to know is what typing the old word does now, and the cmd-renamed line above says which command it reaches.

Two deliberate silences

version is never reported. A release bumps it, and a compatibility check that fires on every release is one nobody leaves switched on. long_version is silent for the same reason.

Derived strings are never reported. usage, full_cmd and help_first_line restate what the declarations already say, so a change in one of them is reported at its source or not at all.

A mount is compared as a declaration — added or removed — and not by what it discovers. Resolving one means running the command it names, which reading two files should not do.

In CI

The shape most releases want is the published spec against what the binary being built says about itself. One of the two specs may be -:

mycli --usage-spec | usage diff mycli.usage.kdl -

As a release gate:

- name: the CLI contract still holds
  run: |
    git show "$(git describe --tags --abbrev=0)":mycli.usage.kdl > released.usage.kdl
    mycli --usage-spec | usage diff released.usage.kdl - --breaking

--breaking drops the compatible and metadata findings, which is what a gate wants to read. --exit-zero reports without failing, for a job that comments on a pull request rather than blocking it. --format json gives the same findings as a list of {category, code, message, location} objects, so a script can act on a specific code.

Compare specs from the same generator

A spec generated from a typed CLI says what the generator of the day could see. Comparing one emitted by an older clap_usage against one emitted by a newer one reports everything the newer emitter learned to express as an interface change — relationships that were always enforced but never written down read as newly added constraints.

Refreshing hk's checked-in fixture is this exactly: 329 constraint-added findings, none of them a change to hk. The findings are a true reading of the two files, so the fix is not to soften them but to compare like with like — the released spec against a spec emitted by the same generator version, which is what a release job does anyway.

What deprecated is for

A deprecation is metadata: the flag still parses, so it costs nobody anything today. What it buys is that the removal it promises shows up here as breaking later, against a spec that announced it first. usage diff is where a deprecation window is observed rather than remembered.