Ei vielä käännetty
Tätä sivua ei ole vielä käännetty suomeksi, joten se näytetään englanniksi. Auta kääntämään
Itertools Module Complexity¶
The itertools module provides efficient looping tools for creating iterators and combinations.
Iterator Functions¶
Creating Iterators¶
| Function | Time | Space | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
count(start, step) |
O(1) per item | O(1) | Infinite counter |
cycle(iterable) |
O(1) per item | O(n) | Stores copy of iterable |
repeat(obj, times) |
O(1) per item | O(1) | Repeat same item |
accumulate(iter, func) |
O(n) total | O(1) | Running totals/reductions |
Filtering Iterators¶
| Function | Time | Space | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
filterfalse(pred, iter) |
O(n) total | O(1) | Opposite filter |
compress(iter, sel) |
O(n) total | O(1) | Mask-based filter |
dropwhile(pred, iter) |
O(n) total | O(1) | Drop while true |
takewhile(pred, iter) |
O(n) total | O(1) | Take while true |
islice(iter, start, stop, step) |
O(n) total | O(1) | Slice iterator |
Combining Iterators¶
| Function | Time | Space | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
chain(iter1, iter2, ...) |
O(n+m) total | O(1) | Combine iterators |
chain.from_iterable(iterable) |
O(n) total | O(1) | Chain nested iterables |
zip_longest(iter1, iter2, ...) |
O(n) total | O(1) | Zip with fill value |
starmap(func, iter) |
O(n) total | O(1) | Apply func(*args) for each args tuple |
tee(iterable, n) |
O(n) init | O(g + n) | n iterators sharing one buffer, so the copies do not multiply it. g = how far the leading iterator has run ahead of the trailing one, not how much has been consumed: iterators advanced in lockstep hold almost nothing |
batched(iterable, n) |
O(n) total | O(n) per batch | Group into n-sized tuples (Python 3.12+) |
pairwise(iterable) |
O(n) total | O(1) | Successive overlapping pairs (Python 3.10+) |
Grouping & Windowing¶
| Function | Time | Space | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
groupby(iterable, key) |
O(n) total | O(1) | Group consecutive |
combinations(iterable, r) |
O(n + r + r×C(n,r)) total | O(n + r) init + O(r) per item | All r-combinations. Setup lands before the first result, so a small result set is not a cheap call. O(r) per result is the upper bound, tight when the results are kept, as list() does; consumed one at a time they cost less |
combinations_with_replacement(iter, r) |
O(n + r + r×C(n+r-1,r)) total | O(n + r) init + O(r) per item | Combinations allowing repeats; same up-front setup as combinations() |
permutations(iterable, r) |
O(n + r + r×P(n,r)) total | O(n + r) init + O(r) per item | All permutations |
product(iter1, iter2, ...) |
O(k + Σnᵢ + k×n₁×n₂×...×nₖ) total | O(k + Σnᵢ) init + O(k) per item | Cartesian product; every input is stored before the first result, so one empty pool empties the result set without making the call free |
Memory Characteristics¶
All itertools functions are lazy iterators, but some cache input data (e.g., cycle, tee, product).
import itertools
def pred(value):
return value % 2 == 0
numbers = range(10)
iter1, iter2 = iter("ab"), iter("cd")
# All of these are O(1) memory (lazy): none of them reads its input until you
# ask for an item, and none keeps more than the item it is handing back
c = itertools.count() # Infinite counter
f = itertools.filterfalse(pred, numbers) # Filtered iterator
z = itertools.chain(iter1, iter2) # Chained iterators
Common Use Cases¶
Infinite Sequences¶
from itertools import count, cycle, repeat
# Infinite counter: O(1) memory
counter = count(0, 1)
next(counter) # 0
next(counter) # 1
# Repeat cycle: O(n) memory for n items
colors = cycle(['red', 'green', 'blue'])
next(colors) # 'red'
next(colors) # 'green'
# Repeat same item: O(1) memory
ones = repeat(1)
next(ones) # 1
next(ones) # 1
Filtering & Selecting¶
from itertools import filterfalse, takewhile, dropwhile
data = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
# Keep items while condition true - O(n)
result = takewhile(lambda x: x < 5, data)
list(result) # [1, 2, 3, 4]
# Drop items while condition true - O(n)
result = dropwhile(lambda x: x < 5, data)
list(result) # [5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
# Opposite of filter - O(n). filterfalse keeps what the predicate rejects,
# so an "is even" predicate leaves the odd numbers
odd = filterfalse(lambda x: x % 2 == 0, data)
list(odd) # [1, 3, 5, 7, 9]
Combinations & Permutations¶
from itertools import combinations, permutations, product
# Combinations: O(C(n,r)) = O(n!/(r!(n-r)!))
combs = combinations('ABC', 2)
list(combs) # [('A', 'B'), ('A', 'C'), ('B', 'C')]
# Permutations: O(P(n,r)) = O(n!/(n-r)!)
perms = permutations('ABC', 2)
list(perms) # [('A', 'B'), ('A', 'C'), ('B', 'A'), ...]
# Product (cartesian): O(n*m*...)
prod = product('AB', '12')
list(prod) # [('A','1'), ('A','2'), ('B','1'), ('B','2')]
Grouping¶
from itertools import groupby
# Group consecutive equal items - O(n)
data = [1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 1, 1]
for key, group in groupby(data):
print(key, list(group))
# 1 [1, 1]
# 2 [2, 2, 2]
# 3 [3]
# 1 [1, 1]
# With key function
data = ['apple', 'apricot', 'banana', 'blueberry']
for key, group in groupby(data, key=lambda x: x[0]):
print(key, list(group))
# a ['apple', 'apricot']
# b ['banana', 'blueberry']
Performance Tips¶
Use itertools for Large Data¶
from itertools import product
def process(x, y):
pass
# Bad: materializes all 1,000,000 pairs at once - O(n*m) memory
pairs = [(x, y) for x in range(1000) for y in range(1000)]
# Better: the 1,000,000 pairs are yielded one at a time and never all held.
# Not O(1) though - product() copies each input to a tuple before yielding
# anything, so this holds the 2,000 input values throughout: O(n + m)
pairs = product(range(1000), range(1000))
for x, y in pairs:
process(x, y)
Chain Multiple Iterators¶
from itertools import chain
def process(item):
pass
def source():
return iter(range(1000))
# Bad: convert to lists then concatenate - O(n+m) memory
result = list(source()) + list(source()) + list(source())
# Good: chain lazily - O(1) memory, and it never builds the joined list
result = chain(source(), source(), source())
for item in result:
process(item)
Window Operations¶
from itertools import islice
# Sliding window: n - w + 1 windows, O(w) memory, and O(n*w) time rather
# than O(n). Each window is a fresh w-tuple, so the windows alone are n*w
# items no matter how they are built: widening w from 2 to 256 at a fixed n
# costs about ten times as much, where O(n) would cost the same. Rebuilding
# with a deque instead of w[1:] + (item,) does not help, because the tuple()
# per window costs the same. Only yielding one reused deque, valid until the
# next iteration, is flat in w
def window(iterable, size):
it = iter(iterable)
w = tuple(islice(it, size))
yield w
for item in it:
w = w[1:] + (item,)
yield w
for w in window(range(10), 3):
print(w) # (0,1,2), (1,2,3), (2,3,4), ...
Version Notes¶
- Python 2.6+: Most functions available
- Python 3.x: All modern functions available
- Python 3.10+:
pairwise()added - Python 3.12+:
batched()added
Related Documentation¶
- Collections Module - For data structures
- Heapq Module - For priority queues
- Functools Module - For higher-order functions