Skip to content

fix(deps): update swc monorepo (major)#5816

Merged
lukastaegert merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
renovate/major-swc-monorepo
Jan 31, 2025
Merged

fix(deps): update swc monorepo (major)#5816
lukastaegert merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
renovate/major-swc-monorepo

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jan 31, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change Pending
swc_compiler_base dependencies major 8.0.0 -> 9.0.0 10.0.0
swc_ecma_parser dependencies major 6.0.2 -> 7.0.0 7.0.1

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am on Friday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Jan 31, 2025

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: rust/Cargo.lock
Command failed: cargo update --config net.git-fetch-with-cli=true --manifest-path rust/parse_ast/Cargo.toml --package swc_ecma_parser@6.0.2 --precise 7.0.0
error: package ID specification `swc_ecma_parser@6.0.2` did not match any packages
Did you mean one of these?

  swc_ecma_parser@7.0.1

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 31, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
rollup ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 31, 2025 5:18am

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 31, 2025

Thank you for your contribution! ❤️

You can try out this pull request locally by installing Rollup via

npm install rollup/rollup#renovate/major-swc-monorepo

Notice: Ensure you have installed the latest stable Rust toolchain. If you haven't installed it yet, please see https://www.rust-lang.org/tools/install to learn how to download Rustup and install Rust.

or load it into the REPL:
https://rollup-j5iks3m31-rollup-js.vercel.app/repl/?pr=5816

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 31, 2025

Performance report

  • BUILD: 7435ms, 730 MB
    • initialize: 0ms, 27.3 MB
    • generate module graph: 2744ms, 551 MB
      • generate ast: 1240ms, 543 MB
    • sort and bind modules: 401ms, 594 MB
    • mark included statements: 4294ms, 730 MB
      • treeshaking pass 1: 1381ms, 699 MB
      • treeshaking pass 2: 684ms (+14ms, +2.0%), 716 MB
      • treeshaking pass 3: 287ms, 727 MB
      • treeshaking pass 4: 268ms, 731 MB
      • treeshaking pass 5: 310ms, 733 MB
      • treeshaking pass 6: 255ms, 734 MB
      • treeshaking pass 7: 234ms, 733 MB
      • treeshaking pass 8: 226ms, 730 MB
      • treeshaking pass 9: 213ms, 730 MB
      • treeshaking pass 10: 214ms, 737 MB
      • treeshaking pass 11: 211ms, 730 MB
  • GENERATE: 717ms, 974 MB
    • initialize render: 0ms, 869 MB
    • generate chunks: 73ms, 880 MB
      • optimize chunks: 0ms, 875 MB
    • render chunks: 628ms, 948 MB
    • transform chunks: 16ms, 974 MB
    • generate bundle: 0ms, 974 MB

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 31, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.79%. Comparing base (abcf4fe) to head (ef95056).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #5816   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.79%   98.79%           
=======================================
  Files         260      260           
  Lines        8116     8116           
  Branches     1369     1369           
=======================================
  Hits         8018     8018           
  Misses         72       72           
  Partials       26       26           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@lukastaegert lukastaegert force-pushed the renovate/major-swc-monorepo branch from a2c03c8 to cb0495a Compare January 31, 2025 05:09
@lukastaegert lukastaegert force-pushed the renovate/major-swc-monorepo branch from cb0495a to 58aa4ae Compare January 31, 2025 05:11
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-swc-monorepo branch from 58aa4ae to 7718fd4 Compare January 31, 2025 05:11
@lukastaegert lukastaegert changed the title fix(deps): update swc monorepo (major) rebase!fix(deps): update swc monorepo (major) Jan 31, 2025
@lukastaegert lukastaegert changed the title rebase!fix(deps): update swc monorepo (major) fix(deps): update swc monorepo (major) Jan 31, 2025
@renovate
Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Jan 31, 2025

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

@lukastaegert lukastaegert added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 31, 2025
Merged via the queue into master with commit f412abd Jan 31, 2025
41 checks passed
@lukastaegert lukastaegert deleted the renovate/major-swc-monorepo branch January 31, 2025 06:28
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 1, 2025

This PR has been released as part of rollup@4.33.0. You can test it via npm install rollup.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant