Potts inference example#25
Open
amueller wants to merge 7 commits into
Open
Conversation
Member
Author
|
|
Member
Author
|
I might do a "small model" and a "big model" plot. lp and trws seem to be a lot slower than the other methods. So there would be a plot showing which methods are very slow and one with more detail. |
Member
Author
|
Ok, I am quite happy now, these three plots are produced: |
Member
Author
|
In particular, |
Member
Author
|
I was just wondering, as the first plot is getting pretty crowded, if I shouldn't do a bar-chart instead and average also over the model size.... |
Also, don't switch back after switching.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This example is to showcase some inference algorithms wrt their runtime and optimization performance.
I plan to have three examples:
It could be that behavior is different here.
I didn't really try tweaking anything yet.
Also, we should probably reverse the sign of "energy". in the plot high is good, but usually low energy is good.
This uses #24.