docs: retire RFC issue template; RFCs move to forum + PR#34
Conversation
Follow-up to #33, completing the move of issue-type work to Linear by retiring the last GitHub issue template. - Remove .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/rfc.yml. - Rewrite the GOVERNANCE.md RFC process to a light flow (forum thread + PR), keeping the 7-day window, lazy consensus, and steward close; lasting outcomes recorded as ADRs. - Repoint the five other RFC links (README, SUPPORT, adr/README, routines/README, templates/README) to the GOVERNANCE RFC-process section. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 31 minutes and 50 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file). ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan refill rate. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, the refill rate gradually slows as usage increases. The highest same-day bursts are limited more strictly. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (7)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
1 participant
Follow-up to #33, completing the move of all issue-type work to Linear by retiring the last GitHub issue template.
What changes
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/rfc.yml.GOVERNANCE.mdRFC process to a light flow: a forum thread plus a PR to this repo, keeping the 7-day comment window, lazy consensus, and steward close. Lasting outcomes are recorded as ADRs inadr/.Per the call to keep the RFC process light for now. Not self-merging; for steward review.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code