Changes for Etherlink 6.next - #423
Closed
NicNomadic wants to merge 4 commits into
Closed
NicNomadic wants to merge 4 commits into
NicNomadic wants to merge 4 commits into
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
NicNomadic
commented
Feb 20, 2026
| This change to the bridge introduces a breaking change in the events that are emitted as part of the bridging process. | ||
| The `deposit` event is now emitted by the [Tezos bridge precompiled contract](https://explorer.etherlink.com/address/0xff00000000000000000000000000000000000001) (`0xff0...0001`), not the null/system address. | ||
|
|
||
| For more information, see TODO BLOG POST. |
Collaborator
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Mind inserting the link
rodibozman
reviewed
Mar 10, 2026
rodibozman
reviewed
Mar 10, 2026
|
The rest lgtm w.r.t. Etherlink 6.2's changelog. |
|
I can't resolve the threads but latest version looks good to me. |
NicNomadic
commented
Mar 17, 2026
|
|
||
| At the end of the period, if a proposal has enough voting power to meet a certain percentage of the total voting power, it moves to the next phase. | ||
| As of the Ebisu update, the leading proposal must gather support from at least 1% of the total voting power to move to the next phase. | ||
| As of Etherlink 6.2, the leading proposal must gather support from at least 1% of the total voting power to move to the next phase. |
Collaborator
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We have to replace all 6.2 by (probably) 6.3, right?
Collaborator
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Done everywhere.
Collaborator
Author
|
This 6.x kernel upgrade was never done before upgrade 7. The changes which are still relevant were submitted in #435, so this PR can be closed. |
This branch was successfully deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Update the doc according to the
6.26.36.46.56.next upgrade proposal.NB: merge only when (and if) the proposal is voted successfully.