Cosmology doc update after deprecating the functional interface#2507
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should this be 'used' rather than using?
|
Sorry, I was in 'recovery from proposal writing mode' and not looking at email. This looks good to me. Reading the docs, it occurs to me that maybe we should provide a method for a user to make a copy of a cosmology object but with specified inputs. Right now they have to remember all the arguments. I can imagine a use case like: now I want the WMAP9 cosmology but with Om increased by 0.05. But not a job for this pull. |
|
Yep, I think it's ready. |
|
Ok, thanks @nhmc! |
Cosmology doc update after deprecating the functional interface
|
Oops, I should have left a comment indicating I was planning on reviewing this, @astrofrog and @nhmc ... I have a few quite minor comments - none are crucial, but I could either leave them here if you want to implement them in a separate PR @nhmc. Or I can try to make a PR myself (although I might not have time to do that for a while...). |
|
If you leave the comments here, I can open a new PR.
|
Here are the documentation changes for the cosmology package as discussed in #2343. I altered the Getting Started section, merged the For Developers and Default Cosmology sections and moved them to the end, and made some other minor changes.