Skip to content

Make sure verbose message is not null - #17363

Merged
Aditya Patwardhan (adityapatwardhan) merged 2 commits into
PowerShell:masterfrom
daxian-dbw:build
May 17, 2022
Merged

Make sure verbose message is not null#17363
Aditya Patwardhan (adityapatwardhan) merged 2 commits into
PowerShell:masterfrom
daxian-dbw:build

Conversation

@daxian-dbw

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

PR Summary

The failure from https://github.com/PowerShell/PowerShell/runs/6471314787?check_suite_focus=true:

VERBOSE: Setting CI variable OLD_VERSION to 7.0.100-preview.4.22252.9
UpdateDotnetRuntime.ps1: D:\a\_temp\00f3a01b-2[18](https://github.com/PowerShell/PowerShell/runs/6471314787?check_suite_focus=true#step:4:19)6-439d-ac62-afcbb0d616d8.ps1:6
Line |
   6 |  ./tools/UpdateDotnetRuntime.ps1 -UpdateMSIPackaging
     |  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     | Cannot bind argument to parameter 'Message' because it is null.

@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR has 3 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Small
Size       : +1 -2
Percentile : 1.2%

Total files changed: 1

Change summary by file extension:
.ps1 : +1 -2

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detetcted.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@adityapatwardhan
Aditya Patwardhan (adityapatwardhan) merged commit f900824 into PowerShell:master May 17, 2022
@adityapatwardhan Aditya Patwardhan (adityapatwardhan) added the CL-Tools Indicates that a PR should be marked as a tools change in the Change Log label May 17, 2022
@daxian-dbw
Dongbo Wang (daxian-dbw) deleted the build branch May 17, 2022 21:01
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🎉v7.3.0-preview.4 has been released which incorporates this pull request.:tada:

Handy links:

Thatgfsj (Thatgfsj) pushed a commit to Thatgfsj/PowerShell that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CL-Tools Indicates that a PR should be marked as a tools change in the Change Log Extra Small

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants