Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade pyjwt from 2.7.0 to 2.13.0#80

Open
dqharris wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
snyk-fix-623a88cba42edace38a1004d04f3d0c1
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade pyjwt from 2.7.0 to 2.13.0#80
dqharris wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
snyk-fix-623a88cba42edace38a1004d04f3d0c1

Conversation

@dqharris

Copy link
Copy Markdown

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 2 vulnerabilities in the pip dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • services/workshop/requirements.txt

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.
  • Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Improper Authentication
🦉 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test Results

98 tests   98 ✅  1s ⏱️
18 suites   0 💤
 8 files     0 ❌

Results for commit 74cf000.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

☂️ Python Coverage

current status: ✅

Overall Coverage

Lines Covered Coverage Threshold Status
1363 1089 80% 0% 🟢

New Files

No new covered files...

Modified Files

No covered modified files...

updated for commit: 74cf000 by action🐍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants