Skip to content
Permalink

Comparing changes

Choose two branches to see what’s changed or to start a new pull request. If you need to, you can also or learn more about diff comparisons.

Open a pull request

Create a new pull request by comparing changes across two branches. If you need to, you can also . Learn more about diff comparisons here.
base repository: bytedance/FullStackBench
Failed to load repositories. Confirm that selected base ref is valid, then try again.
Loading
base: main
Choose a base ref
...
head repository: PGCodeLLM/FullStackBench
Failed to load repositories. Confirm that selected head ref is valid, then try again.
Loading
compare: main
Choose a head ref
Checking mergeability… Don’t worry, you can still create the pull request.
  • 7 commits
  • 1 file changed
  • 4 contributors

Commits on Oct 8, 2025

  1. feat: add evaluation script 

    - supports take inference output file as input then genrate result files
    @dogeggz
    dogeggz committed Oct 8, 2025
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    ba4f6eb View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history

Commits on Oct 15, 2025

  1. feat: add natural languge to result json file

    @dogeggz
    dogeggz committed Oct 15, 2025
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    f8e9e49 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history

Commits on Oct 28, 2025

  1. Apply suggestion from @Copilot 

    Simplify result generation

Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
    @golivax
    golivax and Copilot authored Oct 28, 2025
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    2d696fc View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history

  2. Merge pull request #1 from PGCodeLLM/feat/evaluation 

    feat: add evaluation script
    @golivax
    golivax authored Oct 28, 2025
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    649a80e View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history

Commits on Jan 23, 2026

  1. fix: add num workers arg to evaluate command

    @dogeggz
    dogeggz committed Jan 23, 2026
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    c889e39 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history

  2. fix: make sure num workers at least 1 

    Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
    @dogeggz
    dogeggz and Copilot authored Jan 23, 2026
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    c8c5b33 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history

  3. Merge pull request #2 from PGCodeLLM/fix/eval 

    fix: add  num workers arg to evalaute command
    @dogeggz
    dogeggz authored Jan 23, 2026
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    c6a0f45 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history
Loading